I must, by the convention of this paper, open a piece of this kind with
the nut graf. The nut graf is as follows.
Every cuckoo-clock guide">cuckoo clock currently on display in the showroom windows of the
three cuckoo-clock retailers operating in downtown Helen — Heinrich's
Cuckoo Emporium (1204 Bruckenstrasse, 62 clocks), Die Alte Uhrenhaus
(1106 Main Street, 84 clocks), and Kellner & Sons Timepieces (522 Edelweiss
Strasse, 27 clocks) — has, between the morning of April 10, 2026, and
the morning of April 17, 2026, lost exactly 14 seconds. This figure is
not an average. It is not a mean. It is not a median. It is the
observed loss of every single clock in the set, individually, confirmed
to within a tolerance of ±0.1 second against the cesium atomic time
reference maintained, and published in public form, by the Department
of Physics at the University of North Georgia.
The total aggregate loss, across the 173-clock sample, is 2,422
seconds. This is forty minutes and twenty-two seconds.
On the morning of April 10 the journal Physical Review Letters
published, under open-access terms, a paper from a collaborative team
at the University of Maryland and Johns Hopkins University reporting
the observation of a new regime of zero-resistance superconductivity
in uranium ditelluride (UTe₂) — a rare-earth compound of active
academic interest — under magnetic fields of 10 to 12 Tesla. The
paper's conclusion, in its final sentence, describes the finding as
"a substantial advance in our understanding of spin-triplet pairing
phenomena, with possible implications for the architecture of future
quantum-computing devices."
The paper does not mention cuckoo clocks. The paper does not mention
Helen, Georgia. The paper does not mention the number 14.
The cuckoo clocks mention the number 14 constantly. By missing it.
Methodology
I visited the three shops between 11:40 a.m. and 2:14 p.m. Wednesday,
April 17, carrying (1) a calibrated digital stopwatch, issued by UNG's
physics department to this publication's research desk at my request
as of April 12; (2) the published cesium-reference time feed, displayed
on a UNG-logo-emblazoned Android tablet; and (3) a clipboard with 173
pre-printed rows, one row per clock, each row bearing the clock's shop
inventory number, display-window column, and nominal-face time as
stamped by the proprietor the morning of April 10. The proprietors,
I should say, were all cooperative. Mr. Kreitz, of Heinrich's, in
particular, "welcomed the investigation."
The procedure was: walk the row, record each clock's minute-hand
position at the exact moment the cesium reference rolled to the top of
the minute, and note the deviation in seconds. I did this for 173
clocks.
Every deviation was negative 14 seconds.
Not positive. Not zero. Not thirteen, not fifteen. Negative fourteen.
Horological response
Mr. Wilhelm Kreitz (proprietor, Heinrich's Cuckoo Emporium, and, not
incidentally, my cousin by marriage) offered, on the shop floor, three
theories. The first theory was "the Black Forest manufacturer adjusted
the gear train." He rejected this theory himself within approximately
four seconds, on the grounds that the clocks were manufactured by six
different firms.
The second theory was "the power company's 60-Hertz line-frequency
reference drifted." He rejected this theory as well, on the grounds
that the clocks are mechanical and do not draw line power.
The third theory was: "Something is pulling on the weights."
By "the weights" Mr. Kreitz meant, literally, the cast-iron pine-cone
pendulum weights that drive a cuckoo clock's movement. He suggested,
"lightly," that the magnetic field produced by any imagined distant
UTe₂ superconducting apparatus could, in principle, exert an attractive
force on the pendulum weights sufficient to lengthen the period of the
pendulum's swing by a fraction of a percent.
I observed, as his cousin by marriage, that Helen is approximately 555
miles from the University of Maryland's College Park physics building.
Mr. Kreitz observed, as mine, that "physics doesn't know about distance."
Physicist response
Dr. Ephraim Lamb, a retired solid-state physicist (University of
Chicago, PhD 1978) who has lived in Helen since 2019 and operates an
espresso bar out of the first floor of his Edelweiss Strasse home, was
asked by this reporter, Wednesday evening, whether Mr. Kreitz's
hypothesis was physically coherent.
Dr. Lamb said that it was not.
Asked then whether he could offer an alternative hypothesis for the
observation of a uniform, identical, 14-second loss across 173
independent mechanical clocks of heterogeneous design and manufacture
over the same seven-day window, Dr. Lamb said: "I cannot."
He did not say anything else for approximately two minutes. He then
offered to prepare an espresso. The espresso was acceptable.
This is, then, where the matter stands. The clocks are fourteen seconds
slow. They are each individually fourteen seconds slow. They became so
on, or within 24 hours after, the publication of a superconductivity
paper that does not mention them. No mechanism has been proposed that
survives examination. I have observed the phenomenon. I have recorded
it. I have filed this piece.
The Glockenspiel, at press time, was silent.
Reader Comments
Leave a comment ↓