Anna Ruby Falls is, by the measure of things that get measured in White County, a straightforward attraction. It is a double waterfall — Curtis Creek and York Creek converging at a single granite face — inside the Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forest approximately two miles north of Unicoi State Park on Ga. 356. The falls drop 153 feet on the Curtis side and 50 feet on the York side. The trail from the Visitor Center is 0.4 miles, paved, and ADA-accessible for most of its length. The Visitor Center charges a $3 parking fee, which includes access to the trail, and maintains a check-in kiosk inside the building where visitors sign their names and, optionally, their home city, on a paper sign-in sheet that rangers collect daily and enter into the Forest Service's regional recreation-data system.
This is a routine administrative process. The Forest Service has been doing it, at Anna Ruby Falls, since 1998. The data go into the recreation system, where they inform visitor-count estimates for budget requests, environmental assessments, and the occasional academic recreation-economics study. No one has, to my knowledge, looked at them.
In November 2023, I submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to the Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forest office for three years of check-in records — January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024. The Forest Service responded, after a 14-month processing period, with a CD-ROM containing 12 spreadsheet files totaling 712,000 individual sign-in entries.
I did not, at the time I filed the FOIA, have any particular hypothesis about what the data would show.
The data showed something I was not expecting.
The FOIA
The FOIA response arrived by mail on January 14, 2026, from the Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forest supervisor's office in Gainesville. The cover letter, signed by the Forest's designated FOIA coordinator, noted that the data had been "reviewed for personally identifiable information consistent with Forest Service FOIA policy" and that certain last-name fields had been partially redacted to a first-name-and-last-initial format "in instances where full-name publication would identify a private individual." The letter specified that this redaction standard had been applied "uniformly across the dataset."
The twelve spreadsheet files each cover one calendar quarter. Each entry includes: date, time of entry (to the minute), visitor name (first name, last initial under the redaction standard), home city and state (optional, present in approximately 67% of entries), and party size (a ranger-estimated count entered at the kiosk desk, not reported by visitors themselves). There are 712,000 rows.
The cross-referencing took three weeks, using a methodology I will describe in detail later in this article. The methodology is conservative. The core finding is not, I believe, an artifact of the methodology.
847 individuals have visited Anna Ruby Falls 30 or more times each in the three-year period covered by the data.
The most frequent is a woman identified in the logs as Doris W. She has visited 412 times.
The 847
To be precise about what 847 means: in a three-year dataset covering 1,095 calendar days, 847 distinct name-entries appear 30 or more times each. The distribution is not uniform. The frequency range runs from 30 visits at the bottom of the high-frequency cohort to 412 at the top. The median frequency for the cohort is 47 visits over three years. The mean is 58.4.
Forty-two individuals in the cohort have visited 100 or more times. Of those 42, 11 have visited more than 150 times. Of those 11, three have visited more than 200 times, including Doris W. at 412, a second visitor identified as Clarence M. at 231, and a third identified as Ruth A. at 208.
The geographic data, where available, is as follows: of the 847 high-frequency visitors, 331 list a Georgia home city. Of those 331, 187 list a city within 40 miles of Helen — Cleveland, Gainesville, Cornelia, Clarkesville, Dahlonega, Blairsville, or Helen itself. Of the remaining 144 Georgia visitors, the most common home cities are Atlanta (41), Alpharetta (22), Marietta (19), and Roswell (11).
Doris W., in every check-in entry in the dataset, lists her home city as Cleveland, Georgia. This is consistent across all 412 entries.
Cleveland is 14 miles from Anna Ruby Falls.
Who Is Doris?
The 412 check-ins attributed to Doris W. span every month of the three-year dataset. In 2022, she checked in 127 times. In 2023, she checked in 143 times. In 2024, she checked in 142 times. Her visit frequency is, across the three years, not only high but remarkably stable: there is no warm-season concentration, no winter gap, no vacation-pattern interruption. She visits the falls in January, in March, in July, in October, in December. Her check-in times run from as early as 8:11 a.m. to as late as 4:47 p.m. Her party size, per ranger estimate, is nearly always recorded as one.
She always comes alone.
The 412 entries list her name in the same format throughout: "Doris W." in neat, consistent handwriting — this is a paper sign-in sheet; the handwriting is photographed and transcribed by rangers — that one ranger, speaking to me on background in January, described as "very legible, very consistent, like she's been writing her name on forms all her life."
Beyond the name, the home city of Cleveland, and the 412 visits, I know nothing about Doris W. The FOIA redaction standard prevents me from obtaining her full name from the Forest Service data. I have not attempted to contact her through other means. I do not know her age, her occupation, or her reasons for visiting Anna Ruby Falls an average of once every 2.7 days for three consecutive years.
I know that she comes, and that she comes alone, and that she has come 412 times.
What The Rangers Say
I spoke to four current and former Anna Ruby Falls Visitor Center rangers in January. Three spoke on background. One spoke on the record.
The on-record source is a ranger who has worked the Visitor Center intermittently since 2021 and who, per his own account, has been the person most continuously present at the check-in kiosk of any current staff member. I am not publishing his name because, as a federal employee, he requested I characterize him as a Forest Service representative rather than as an individual.
"There are people we see frequently," he said. "Regulars. We have regulars. Some people walk here the way other people walk in a park. That's the trail — it's paved, it's easy, it's beautiful. We see some faces all the time."
I showed him the data summary: 847 high-frequency visitors, top frequency 412.
He looked at it for a moment.
"Four hundred and twelve times," he said.
He said the number was higher than he would have guessed.
I described Doris W.'s entry pattern: Cleveland address, solo visits, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. range, consistent handwriting.
He thought about it. He said he could not place her. He said Cleveland was close enough that it was plausible someone would drive up frequently, but 412 times was "a lot even for a local."
I asked whether the Visitor Center had any protocol for identifying or engaging with high-frequency visitors.
He said there was no such protocol.
I asked if he had ever noticed a visitor who seemed to come very frequently.
He said there were a few people he recognized by face but not by name, and that he generally did not look at names on the sign-in sheet except when counting entries for the daily tally.
"We're not checking," he said. "We're just counting."
Reader Comments
Leave a comment ↓